RESUMEN
Occupational nerve injuries span a broad array of pathologies and contribute toward functional limitation, disability, and economic impact. Early and accurate recognition, treatment, and management of workplace factors rely on a thorough understanding of the anatomic and biomechanical factors that drive nerve injury. This review explores the interplay between anatomy, biomechanics, and nerve pathology common to occupational nerve injury and provides the treating physician with a rational, evidence-based approach to diagnosis and to occupational aspects of management. Assessment of potential occupational nerve injury begins with a detailed understanding of the employee's work duties through a biomechanical lens. One must consider likelihood of occupational causation while accounting for predisposing conditions or preexisting symptoms. Beyond overt crush injury or laceration, potential mechanisms of nerve injury, with effects compounded over time, include compression, stretch, vibration, and repetitive or high-force movements of regional muscles and joints. Injury often occurs at nerve locations that experience higher pressures, changes in pressure over time, or abrupt changes in trajectory, often near a tethered point. This understanding, coupled with condition-specific knowledge presented in this review, equips managing physicians to diagnose occupational nerve injury and enhance treatment recommendations with rational activity modifications or equipment that can protect the nerve or decrease likelihood of continued injury. Long-term management often involves follow-up to assess effectiveness of interventions in the setting of the work environment, with gradual progression of the worker toward return to unrestricted duty or to a point of maximal medical improvement.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile infection is a common hospital-associated infection spread via patient contact or contaminated environments. The risk for spread of C difficile may be greater in inpatient rehabilitation units than in some hospital units as patients are not confined to their rooms and often share equipment. Environmental disinfection is challenging in shared medical equipment, especially in equipment with complex designs. The study aimed to examine the presence of C difficile spores within an acute rehabilitation environment and to evaluate disinfection effectiveness. DESIGN: Cultures were performed on 28 rehabilitation rooms, 28 rehabilitation floor surfaces, and 80 shared devices and equipment. Two disinfection interventions were implemented, and environmental cultures then were repeated postintervention. RESULTS: Environmental cultures positive for CD spores were rehabilitation rooms (1/28), rehabilitation floors (13/28), and wheelchairs (3/20). After the implementation of new disinfection methods, repeat cultures were obtained and produced negative results. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsporicidal disinfectant was not effective on hospital floors. Sporicidal disinfection of the floor is important when rates of C difficile infection are increased. Wheelchairs are complex devices and difficult to properly clean. The hospital purchased an ultraviolent device for wheelchair cleaning with a subsequent reduction in spores on repeat cultures. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Recognize the impact of Clostridium difficile infections on the healthcare system; (2) Describe potential reservoirs of Clostridium difficile in the inpatient rehabilitation environment; and (3) Discuss interventions that may be implemented to reduce the reservoirs of Clostridium difficile on the rehabilitation unit. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
